BetaPoly

Prediction markets powered by Polymarket data.

Related topics

PoliticsPredictionsSportsPredictionsCryptoPredictionsFinancePredictionsGeopoliticsPredictionsTechPredictionsCulturePredictionsEconomyPredictionsWeatherPredictionsElectionsPredictions

Popular markets

Top VolumeEnding SoonMost LiquidBreaking NewsLive SportsLive EsportsPulsePortfolio

Explore BetaPoly

All marketsNewest marketsLeaderboardChart previewTerms of UseLoginSign up
BetaSouls Inc. © 2026·Privacy·Terms of Use·Docs·Help

BetaPoly is a demonstration prediction-markets frontend that fetches public data from Polymarket. Trading on BetaPoly uses virtual BetaPoints only: no real money, wallets, or crypto are involved. Powered by the Polymarket public APIs. Operated by the BetaSouls team.

BetaPoly
TrendingBreakingNew
PoliticsSportsEsportsCryptoIranFinanceGeopoliticsTechCultureEconomyWeatherElectionsMentions
HomeMarketsLiveRanksPortfolio
Court·fraud

LA Mayoral Election: Court Rules 1st Round Fraudulent?

1%chance
Loading chart data
$805 Vol.
AmountBalance 10,000.00 BP

By trading, you agree to the Terms of Use.

Related

Democratic Presidential Nominee 2028

20%

Republican Presidential Nominee 2028

1%

Presidential Election Winner 2028

20%

This market will resolve to “Yes” if any court in the United States issues a ruling that widespread fraud, fraudulent conduct, or illegal manipulation of votes occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election by October 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A ruling is defined as any written order, judgement, opinion, or decision, including per curiam opinions, summary orders and sua sponte rulings issued by a relevant court. Unwritten oral rulings, tentative rulings, settlements, orders to show cause, or other procedures which do not constitute a finalized ruling will not count. A qualifying ruling of fraud must find that widespread, intentional voter fraud or vote-manipulation occurred during the first round of the 2026 Los Angeles mayoral election. Procedural irregularities, administrative errors, or isolated rulings on individual cases of voter fraud will not count. The primary resolution source will be official information from the relevant court; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Resolveroracle.uma.xyz (UMA)
Propose resolution

No recent activity